Hello Dezmodian, thanks for responding.
Well, my friend, this conversation didn't go at all as I was expecting.
You said:
"Clearly, you are not. Pointing out your lack of education on what consists of a logical fallacy, with examples, is not a failure of logic, nor is it a distraction: it goes to the core argument of your response."
Again, my friend, feel free to look up the definition of a red herring.
One of the most common red herrings of late is the emotional fillabuster: ignore the arguments by interjecting an emotional outburst as a distraction.
Is there some part of the definition of a red herring that you missed? You introduced a new topic as a distraction, quite directly saying you refuse to deal with the arguments until your new issue is addressed.
Now, when you're called on it, you avoid the issue. Instead you come up with a bit of word salad that doesn't make a clear argument or arrive at a clear conclusion.
Then you say:
"You are not serious about this."
And now we're in classic ad hominem territory.
You assign me a label -- asserting that I'm somehow "not serious" about this, without explaining why or what that even means.
You then use this label as an excuse to avoid addressing my arguments.
My friend, you're working your way through the list of logical fallacies rapidly.
You said:
"...people who bluster about how much they know are often the least informed in the conversation."
"Oh, on that we agree."
My friend, you agree... yet you're still the one appealing to your supposed superior knowledge.
Can you see the irony?
You said:
"You have failed to address your fallacies, typical of angry theists without an understanding on the topics they lie about. Your misuse and abuse of fallacies is blatant."
This seems to be projection.
You say "failed to address your fallacies," yet I've made sure to address every word you've said.
While you keep avoiding the logical fallacies you employ when called on them.
You also accuse me of being "angry," yet I quite enjoy these conversations.
However, it would be easy to understand how someone could read your words and come to the conclusion that you could be angry.
You said:
"Have the day you deserve."
What a dismal thing to write, my friend.
Instead, I hope you have an amazing day, and another amazing day tomorrow.
I have no wish for you to suffer.
In all seriousness: have a great day, my friend!