Hello Guatama, thanks for taking the time to respond.

You said:

"Not likely inspired. According to Jesus , the sinless should throw the first stone. And that was himself. He didn't, nor did He question or correct the interpretation of the said Law. Therefore it follows that He did not fulfil all that the Law required.

But the scriptures claim that He did.

So is Jn8 (1)-(11) inspired? I doubt yery much so."

Actually, Jesus did follow the Law.

The Law requires the testimony of two witnesses who agree, in order to convict someone of a crime:

“You must not convict anyone of a crime on the testimony of only one witness. The facts of the case must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses” (Deuteronomy 19:15, NLT)

Likewise, the Law requires that both the man and the woman be taken for judgment and punishment:

"If a man is found lying with the wife of another man, both of them shall die, the man who lay with the woman, and the woman" (Deuteronomy 22:22 ESV).

After the mob left, there were no witnesses left to condemn the woman. Jesus could not therefore condemn her, because He lacked two or three witnesses whose testimony agreed.

Likewise, the man was not present with her. This means the mob themselves were not following the Law, which would have required both the man and woman. Given that it would be hard to catch the woman in adultery without the man there with her, it seems they intentionally let the man go.

Jesus is following the Law perfectly. After the mob left, Jesus could not condemn her without breaking the Law.