Hello Morten, thanks for taking the time to write.

I get the sense that you didn't read the article before commenting. You said:

"Thing is, no Roman sources can ever be conjured to find evidence for any trial of some infamous Jewish rabble rouser."

Yet we do have exactly that.

In the article, I quote Tacitus, one of Rome's finest historians. He affirms that Christ lived in Israel, died under Pontius Pilate, and that after Jesus' death, His followers did not disperse or disband, but grew, until there was a sizeable presence of Christians in Rome.

Likewise, I quote Jewish history, which affirms Jesus lived, performed miracles, was sentenced to death, and died by hanging on a cross on the eve of Passover.

Neither Tacitus nor the Jewish Sanhedrin had any connection to Christianity. They weren't using Christian sources, nor were they beholden to them to push Christian propaganda in any way. They recorded only what they believed to have happened.

And their records corroborate the Gospel's claims perfectly.